Iran and Tensions Surrounding it in the Region
0
The
international community is largely still transfixed with the situation
surrounding Iran’s Nuclear Program. Officials from both U.S. and Europe believe
that Tehran is trying to build nuclear weapons while Iran maintains that the
Program’s goal is only to provide electricity to the country without using oil
supplies that can be sold abroad as well as to procure the fuel for the medical
reactors. And though the tensions surrounding the Iran’s Nuclear Program in one
of the most volatile regions of the contemporary world have been there for
years their recent escalation began in November 2011, due to the report of the
international inspectors from IAEA and the heavier sanctions that immediately
followed from the West.
Following the
sanctions came Iran’s response in the form of threat to close the Strait of
Hormuz disrupting around 20% of global oil traffic. Threats were answered by the U.S. that made it quite clear they prepared
to take all necessary actions to maintain the oil flow crucial to the global
economy. Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important straits for the
international trade exchange and security. While traversing that strait, ships
have to pass through the territorial waters of Iran and Oman and follow Traffic
Separation Scheme throughout the strait to escape the risk of collision.
Basically, that Scheme separates inbound and outbound traffic in the Hormuz
through the establishment of two 3 km (1.9 mile) lanes and another 3 km (1.9
mile) in between to navigate the ships flow through Hormuz. Total traffic lane
is now around 10 km (5.7 mile) wide.
Generally speaking Iran does not have any legal rights
to block of suspend transit passage of ships through Hormuz. Such actions
should be considered not only grave breach of international law, but due to the
economic and trade nature of the strait, the threat to the international peace
and security. That is why it is not surprising that U.S. are prepared to take
action in such case even with the use of force. The fact that the presence of
the U.S. warships continuously increases in the Gulf area only confirms the
gravity of the situation.
Moreover, the tensions around Iran’s Nuclear Program
boiled to the point when Israel made a clear message that it is ready to attack
Iran’s nuclear facilities. Such statements from Israel are causing the oil
prices to go up thus having an effect that surpasses regional level and goes
straight to rattling the already unstable global economy that still can’t get
back from sovereign debt crisis in Europe.
Recently global geopolitical players came to the
consent to continue negotiations with Iran, after the authorities in Teheran
made statements that they would allow international inspectors access to the
classified military complex Parchin. Before that moment Iran refused such
access. However, it is still unclear how limited and conditional such access
would be.
The primary goal of the sanctions against Iran is
usually described as an effort to disrupt its Nuclear Program by the means of
distancing the country from international financial system, including both
institutions and funds. The coordinated sanctions imposed by Europe and U.S. aim
first at the banking system. Second target became companies that are related to
the Iran’s nuclear industry as well as some petrochemical and oil industries.
Common understanding is that such sanctions should weaken Iranian government
through depravation from possibilities to develop and invest in the oil
industry and gasoline refinement.
As sanctions came into the effect the response of
Teheran was to further escalate the tensions by suspending the oil exports to
U.K. and France and threatening to do the same in relation to other European
states. Interesting fact is that these countries are least dependent on Iranian
oil from all 27 European Union states. Thus the Teheran’s pressure so far seems
more diplomatic in nature than real response to sanctions.
The intensification of tensions around the situation is
on the rise since. Experts speculate about Israeli attack on Iran nuclear
facilities, enforcement of sanctions grows stronger and Iran threatens with
retaliation, while at the same time expresses its readiness to cooperate with
IAEA to prove peaceful nature of its Nuclear Program.
Another situation that adds pressure on regional
security is of course the atrocities in Syria. While the situation is of a
grave concern to the international community UN Security Council is at the
legal stalemate initiated by Russia and China. So far both Russia and the West agree only that the main
role in negotiating peace in the country should belong to the Arab League. The
problem is the fresh memory of the Libyan resolution in the Security Council.
In the Libyan case, the U.S. and EU countries’ interpretation of the strict resolution on
the situation was so wide it included participation on one side of the civil
war, which led to the change of the regime in Libya and ultimately to the
brutal death of former dictator Moammar Gadhafi, who (although an international
criminal) should have been brought to justice. At the same time Russia and
China see an intervention into Syria as an opportunity for U.S. to weaken Iran
distancing the country from one of its allies.
Moreover, the rising tensions in the relations between
Iran and Azerbaijan making the picture of a very tense and otherwise overloaded
with security issues region quite complete. Fearing the possible presence of
the U.S. forces close to Iranian northern borders coupled with concerns for the
large Azerbaijani minority living on the northern part of Iran, made Teheran
start a real information war against Azerbaijan in its media, following the
attempts to assassinate famed Israelis on the Azerbaijani soil through
specially trained armed groups.
Overall situation in the region has been tied into a
very tense geopolitical knot. World powers are watching the situation that can
spill over into the violent outbreak very closely, trying to allocate the
possible scenarios for the future of Iran. Which at the moment doesn’t seem so
bright.
Kamal Makili-Aliyev
Doctor of Laws (LL.D)
0 comments: